Timothy Michel
February 23, 2006
Privatizing national security is fundamentally wrong, whether it is sold to a British company or a UAE company. We have no world constitutional government that forms us into a world union so we, who agree to form into union for our greater advantage, have no world body of law to turn to ensure our equal treatment. Until such time as we have a constitutionally instituted government ratified by all the peoples of the world, we continue to have need to turn to the securities of our existing unions. Privatization is just the expedient selling of public assets to opportunists looking for a quick return on investment. There is no public good conferred by privatization. Privatization is just what it says, the transferring of public assets into the hands of a few private individuals. This will only lead to the demoralization of this country as well as all others where private capital usurps the will of the people in those countries. And if you think that privatization works, consider that Marvin Bush sat as a director and financed by Kuwaiti- American company was charged with the security of the Twin Towers and Dulles Airport on 9/11/2001. That same company was renamed Stratsec after 9/11 and now provides security for the Army Navy Air force and Marines. Please see:
Belated note on Stratesec, Inc, from a former insider
FAMILY BUSINESS AT THE WATERGATE
This isn't a matter of Islamophobia. This is a matter of our need to be secure in our persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. If foreign governments have control of the security of this country, then what would stop them from violating our rights? I firmly believe in doing business with other countries, and that there should be a transfer of goods back and forth between countries. But we should not allow other countries to take over the functions of protecting our interests. That is not in the interest of global business; that is in the interest of foreign control of the basic functions of our government. In my opinion, this president is not our president. This president is an agent of foreign governments with designs to carve up this country and put it on the market to the highest bidder. Neither the Saudi’s nor United Arab Emirates have any interest in our reducing our dependency on oil. They have said so, they have stated that it would not be in the interest of third world peoples for us to turn away from oil as our primary form of energy. Shouldn’t this really read that it is not in their interest for us to turn away from oil and begin addressing the formidable challenge of global warming that their oil is causing? Until such time as we ratify a constitution guaranteeing the rights of all citizens of the world, we do not have transparent borders. We have no international agreement securing our fair treatment by all other peoples of the world. Until we have that, no foreign country including England has a right to be involved in the security operations of this country. Our national security is not a commodity that can be placed on the world market. Our national security is the only assurance that we have of any protection against abuses from world opportunists. No British security in America, No UAE security in America. And now this is out in the open that is what is wrong with security operations in America. I sensed it, something wasn’t quite right with security personnel that were supposedly protecting me. The problem was that they weren’t working for the interest of us; they were working for the interest of some international company that is only concerned with obtaining money that will ultimately give them power over us all. The last five years has seen the transfer of half a trillion dollars out of the public treasury and into private hands. What do you think that does to the sovereignty of this country? We do our own security period. The Bush family has significant ties to families in the Middle East. See these Websites:
Marvelous Marvin, the Man Who Seems to be in All the Right Places